I’ve had a lot of faith questions recently. I’ve been
disillusioned by evangelical Christianity (my roots) and its adherence to what
seems less like the gospel of Christ and more like the gospel of politics and morality.
I’ve been working through my questions in therapy—writing out almost 50
different “Things that I don’t necessarily believe but that I have heard and/or
believed at some point in my life and that linger in my psyche” and contrasting
them with “Things that I am currently trying to believe but that are sometimes
overshadowed by old, lingering beliefs.” If you’ve never written out your theological
beliefs, then I encourage you to do so. It’s an eye-opening exercise.
I’ve also started reading two books by Richard Rohr, a
Franciscan friar who founded the Center for Contemplation and Action. Contemplative
Christianity is something that I began exploring in Divinity School and that I have
been exploring deeper for the past decade, mostly through the concept of
mindfulness—of being present right now and seeing where and how life and God are
working in this moment.
Last night, as I was reading one of my books, “Yes, And…,” I
read something that was very helpful to my disillusionment. Rohr writes about a
long-standing division in Judeo-Christian tradition between the Exodus and the
Leviticus/Numbers traditions. The Exodus tradition, he says, is a tradition of liberation
while the Leviticus/Numbers traditions is a priestly tradition that tries to organize,
control, and perpetuate the initial experience of freedom.
He continues to assert that while we need both traditions to
hold in balance the inner experience of freedom and the outer work of holiness,
we instead tend to lean one way or the other, thus creating a world of dichotomies:
right or left, liberal or conservative, establishment or disestablishment, contemplative
or activist. “[Both sides] really do need each other,” he writes, “but, in most
of history, the priestly tradition has been in control [of] and defined religion.”
Did you know that the political terms right and left come
from the Estates General in France? The ordinary people, most of whom were
poor, sat on the left while the nobility and clergy (who upheld the priestly
tradition) sat on the right. The right normally protected continuity and status
quo while the left looked for change and reform. The same is true today.
Furthermore, much of history has been written, read, controlled,
and interpreted by the right—except for “the unique revelation called the
Bible, which is alternative history from the side of the enslaved, the
dominated, the oppressed, and the poor, leading up to the totally scapegoated
Jesus himself.”
The gospel of Jesus Christ is an alternative history that is
much bigger than right or left or what any one tradition can hold. May we be a
people about the redeeming work of Christ and seek to uphold, above all else, the
liberating, life-changing, justice-love and action of God.
Amen.
No comments:
Post a Comment