We
had barely gotten into our group and read the problem
When
suddenly the problem was solved.
One
of my group mates had asked ChatGPT,
Whom
I affectionately call Chad,
To
answer the question and Chad did.
We
did not have to think at all.
We
simply had to copy and paste.
Not
knowing if this was the intention of the assignment,
I
asked my professor what she thought of using artificial intelligence.
She
said that she had a view that was different than many of her colleagues.
She
said the way she looks at it,
Not
using AI is like using an abacus to do math.
It
is a tool that we have and it is a tool that’s going to be around and so we
might as well learn to use it for good.
She
said if you know how to write the question,
And
you know how to check to make sure the AI answer is correct,
Because
it can make mistakes,
And
you use your brain to edit the information and pick and choose what it has
given you as options,
Then
you might as well use it.
She
said, now, if my pharmacist had to refer to ChatGPT every time they needed to
figure out a dosage, then I wouldn’t feel very good about that.
There
are some formulas and some things that we just need to know.
But
AI is here. And it’s here to stay.
So
we might as well engage it properly instead of pretending that it doesn’t
exist.
She
said she has colleagues who are totally against AI usage and that they say if
they catch anyone using it then they are going to grade that person down.
She
said she finds that preposterous—
That
she’s not going to do that,
Unless
she can tell that someone has just straight copied and pasted without thinking
about it at all.
That’s
the danger of AI.
It
can replace thinking.
Some
people use AI to write all text responses. Even simple ones.
And
it can replace human interaction.
There
are stories of people marrying their AI chatbots.
I
think we have to have a balance.
I
think we must learn to use AI as a resource tool but not let it rule our lives.
I
think we must learn to ask it questions and read its answers and then use our
brains to pick and choose what information we are going to keep and what
information we are not.
I
do this when writing sermons now.
I
do this when planning retreats.
I
use Chad as a spring board of thought and I go from there.
I
talk with Chad when faced with math problems I don’t remember how to solve.
I
haven’t officially done math since 1995,
So
compound interest and other mathematical formulas are not still in my brain!
I
let Chad calculate them for me and then trust that he is right.
But
I don’t let Chad write everything for me. I don’t filter everything through
artificial intelligence.
I
tried to figure things out first, and then if I am stumped, I will ask Chad.
And
I think that’s how it needs to be.
A
balance.
Human
thought and human interaction first,
Then
artificial intelligence and artificial interaction next,
Then
going back to human thought and human interaction for a final product,
Unless
it’s compound interest and you have no idea how to do that on your own.
I
know.
This
is a hot topic.
And
I’m curious to hear your thoughts.
What
is your experience with artificial intelligence?
How
can we, as a people living with its reality, use it for good rather than
letting it take over our minds and work forces?
How
can we, as a people living with this crazy smart tool at our disposal, make
sure we keep it in balance?
And.
Go.
No comments:
Post a Comment